The Teleological Argument Questioning the Existence of the Maker of All

Introduction: Looking into the Essence of the Argument Since the dawn of the human race, people have been concerned with the existence of a supernatural being that they own their lives to. With God being the supreme creature, everything else is believed to be His doing and, therefore, having a specific purpose. The given statement, though, raises many questions concerning the purpose of the things and phenomena that are generally considered useless, as well as the things and phenomena that produce objectively deteriorating effect on the universe and its elements.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Teleological Argument: Questioning the Existence of the Maker of All specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Thesis statement: Since the purpose of certain elements of the universe can be questioned or has not yet been discovered by people, it can be argued that the teleological argument should be considered the ultimate trut h. As it has been stated above, a number of objects and phenomena do not seem to have their own purpose – or, to be more exact, their purpose quite hard to define. The given state of affairs is quite natural, since people do not possess absolute knowledge. However, the absence of the necessary links between certain objects can shake one’s convictions concerning the Creationist postulates. Taking the Argument with a Grain of Salt: Concerning the Existing Objections To address the issue in question in the most efficient way, the existing contradictions to the teleological argument must be considered. Taking a closer look at the objections to the ideas offered above, one can see the complexity of the issue in question. Natural selection and the existing biological complexity The idea that every single element depends on another one and cannot work properly without it, which the teleological argument is based on, does not seem so legit when considering the fact that the pr ocess of natural selection is generally considered inadequate.Advertising Looking for essay on philosophy? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Therefore, the given idea presupposes that a number of creatures develop organs that do not seem to have any purpose or specific function in their bodies. One of the most graphic examples of the given statement is the fact that in complex organs, every element alone is useless, yet when all of them are out together, they start a clockwork process. Where logics fails: the inconsistencies of the universe design Another peculiar idea to be considered is Kant’s conclusion that God’s existence is not a predicate. There is no point in mentioning how many misconceptions the given statement spawned and how many of them remain unresolved even now. One of the most notorious questions is whether Kant meant predicate as a grammatical or philosophical unit (Moore). However, the way in whic h Moore puts the solution to the problem, i.e., the idea that God’s existence does not add anything to the context in which people understand existence, presupposes that the existence of the rest of the objects and phenomena cannot be considered as filled with purpose. Exploring the Links between the Elements of the Universe: Responses to the Objections Even though the objections listed above seem quite legitimate, they can also seem doubtful when the opposing opinions are considered. Natural selection and the existing biological complexity Weirdly enough, natural selection can also be the proof that the teleological argument is true. As a matter of fact, even Darwin, who is believed to have shaken the postulates of theosophy with his â€Å"outrageous† idea of natural selection, agreed that some of the stages of development, like the development of separate parts of an eye, do not hold water. Therefore, it seems that the idea of everything complex developing from simpl er things is not always true.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Teleological Argument: Questioning the Existence of the Maker of All specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The given discovery can be interpreted from the standpoint of purpose as well: what had its purpose from the very start did not need to develop: â€Å"Typically, the proponents of ‘intelligent design’ point out that complex organs such as the eye are constructed of numerous parts, each of which appears to be useless except when working with the others. How are we to conceive of the evolution of all these parts?† (Rachels and Rachels 19). Thus, the law of natural selection works as a proof for the teleological argument. Existence as a predicate: when two ideas collide As for the argument that the elements of the universe cannot have a purpose since the Maker obviously does not, it can be argued that God designed the world so tha t its elements could have the purpose, whether he does or does not. Conclusion: When Everything Has its Own Purpose Judging by the arguments offered above, one can claim with sufficient amount of certainty that most of the things or phenomena that people are familiar with serve a specific purpose. Therefore, the objections against the given arguments, though reasonable, seem invalid. However, it is equally hard to confirm the given idea; since it is impossible to take account of all elements of the universe, the teleological argument is most unlikely to ever be proven. Once again, it has become clear that religious beliefs are a question of faith, not reason. Works Cited Moore, George Edward. â€Å"Is Existence a Predicate?† Aristotelian Society Supplementary xv(1936): 185. Rachels, James and Stuart Rachels. Problems from Philosophy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2009. Print. This essay on The Teleological Argument: Questioning the Existence of the Maker of All was written and submitted by user Belen Hurley to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Definition and Examples of Canadian English

Definition and Examples of Canadian English Canadian English is a variety of the English language that is used in Canada. A Canadianism is a word or phrase that originated in Canada or has special meaning in Canada. Although there are many similarities between Canadian English and American English, the English spoken in Canada also  shares a number of features with the English spoken in the United Kingdom. Examples and Observations Margery Fee and Janice McAlpineStandard Canadian English is distinct from both Standard British English and Standard American English. Additions to, and divergences from, the English of the motherland, once derided by genteel British visitors to Canada, are now recorded in- and given legitimacy by- Canadian dictionaries.Canadians who are aware of some of the unique elements of Canadian English are less likely to assume that their usage is wrong when they look in vain for a familiar word, meaning, spelling, or pronunciation in a British or American dictionary. Similarly, they are less likely to assume the speakers of other dialects of English are making a mistake when they use an unfamiliar word or pronunciation.Charles BoburgWith respect to lexical variation or vocabulary, Canadian English [is] much closer to American than to British English where those varieties differ, though a small set of unique Canadian words... [shows] that Canadian English is not simply a mixture of British an d American forms. Canadianisms like bachelor apartment, bank machine, Chesterfield, eavestrough, grade one, parkade, runners or running shoes, scribbler and washroom are not merely words for things found only or mostly in Canada, but Canadian words for universal concepts that have other names outside Canada (compare American studio apartment, ATM, couch, gutters, first grade, parking garage, sneakers or tennis shoes, notebook and restroom; or British studio flat or bed-sit, cash dispenser, settee, gutters, first form, car park, trainers, exercise book and lavatory or loo).In phonological and phonetic terms, Standard Canadian English is also much more similar to Standard American than to Standard British English; in fact, it was shown that, with respect to major variables of phonemic inventory, Standard Canadian and American English are largely indistinguishable. Simon HorobinIn terms of pronunciation, Canadians tend to sound like Americans to most people from outside North America; distinctive features include the rhotic pronunciation of car, the d-like pronunciation of bottle, and the use of American alternatives like tomayto for British English tomahto, and skedule for British English shedule.Canadian English does not follow American English in all such cases; British English preferences are found in words like news, which is pronounced nyoos rather than noos,  and in the pronunciation of anti, where American English has  AN-tai.Laurel J. Brinton and Margery FeeCanada is an officially bilingual country, though the balance is heavily tipped toward English: in 1996, of a population slightly more than 28 million, 84% claimed a knowledge of English, while only 14% were exclusively French speakers (97% of whom live in Quebec), and fewer than 2% knew neither official language.Tom McArthurCanadians often use the particle eh (as in Its nice, e h?) where Americans use huh. . . . As elsewhere, eh is used in Canada to mean Could you repeat what you said, but more commonly it is a question tag, as in You do want to go, eh? (i.e., dont you?), or serves to elicit agreement or confirmation (Its nice, eh?) and to intensify commands, questions, and exclamations (Do it, eh?). Christopher Gorham and Liane BalabanAuggie Anderson: That guy. What is he wearing?Natasha Petrovna: Green tie, ugly shirt.Auggie Anderson: And what does that tell you?Natasha Petrovna: Hes a businessman with no style?Auggie Anderson: No. Hes a Canadian businessman. An American would have ordered ham or Canadian bacon. He ordered back bacon and she asked for a serviette.

The Discussion part for paper of Customers and marketers co-creating a Essay

The Discussion part for paper of Customers and marketers co-creating a purchase experience - Essay Example Customer purchases is not only about products and services. The personal experience of the customers upon purchasing a product and/or services also matters. The process of co-creation is important since it could enable the customers to develop a more valuable experience and emotional attachment with the company’s product and/or a specific brand name. This kind of relationship between the customers and marketers is vital in the development and strengthening of customers’ satisfaction and loyalty. The Co-creation theory focuses merely on the relationship between the customers and the marketers. Highlighting the role of employees and customer service manager in co-creation theory could create a more promising effect on the customers’ attitude and behavioural loyalty. Customers’ emotional loyalty is another aspect that can be included in the theory model since it has equally proven to be a result of strengthening the relationship between the customers and the marketers. Another area of consideration is the customer complaint management and service recovery since both could support and strengthen the customers’ satisfaction. Co-creation marketing approach could lead to customer satisfaction and trust that is needed in order to strengthen the relationship between the customers and the marketers. A strong relationship bond between the two is essential in developing and maintaining customers’ loyalty. Based on the research method that was presented in this study, satisfying the customers has more relevance in strengthening the relationship between the customers and the marketers more than establishing ‘trust’ alone. Therefore, marketers should focus more on customers’ satisfaction in order to strengthen the relationship between the two and for the marketers to achieve attitudinal and behavioural loyalty from the customers. Increasing the customers’ satisfaction is not totally dependent on